Literaturdatenbank
Literaturdatenbank |
|
 |
|
Spinks, P. Q., Thomson, R. C., Gidişa, M., & Shaffer, B. H. (2014). Multilocus phylogeny of the new-world mud turtles (kinosternidae) supports the traditional classification of the group. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, (in press).
Added by: Sarina Wunderlich (06 Jul 2014 16:17:23 UTC) |
| Resource type: Journal Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.03.025 BibTeX citation key: Spinks2014a View all bibliographic details  |
Categories: General Keywords: Emydidae, Genetik - genetics, Pseudemys nelsoni, Schildkröten - turtles + tortoises, Systematik - taxonomy, Trachemys scripta Creators: Gidişa, Shaffer, Spinks, Thomson Collection: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution |
Views: 7/923
Views index: 25% Popularity index: 6.25% |
| Abstract |
|
Highlights We generate phylogenies from 14 nuclear loci for the Kinosternoidea. The genus Kinosternon was recovered as monophyletic with respect to Sternotherus. The recently erected genus Cryptochelys was not recovered as monophyletic. The Kinosternon scorpioides species group was widely paraphyletic. Our analyses indicate that many kinosternid species might not be well demarcated. Abstract A goal of modern taxonomy is to develop classifications that reflect current phylogenetic relationships and are as stable as possible given the inherent uncertainties in much of the tree of life. Here, we provide an in-depth phylogenetic analysis, based on 14 nuclear loci comprising 10,305 base pairs of aligned sequence data from all but two species of the turtle family Kinosternidae, to determine whether recent proposed changes to the group’s classification are justified and necessary. We conclude that those proposed changes were based on 1) mtDNA gene tree anomalies, 2) preliminary analyses that do not fully capture the breadth of geographic variation necessary to motivate taxonomic changes, and 3) changes in rank that are not motivated by non-monophyletic groups. Our recommendation, for this and other similar cases, is that taxonomic changes be made only when phylogenetic results that are statistically well-supported and corroborated by multiple independent lines of genetic evidence indicate that non-monophyletic groups are currently recognized and need to be corrected. We hope that other members of the phylogenetics community will join us in proposing taxonomic changes only when the strongest phylogenetic data demand such changes, and in so doing that we can move toward stable, phylogenetically informed classifications of lasting value.
Added by: Sarina Wunderlich |